![]() ![]() The SLC can be used to predict the usability of user interfaces in early stages of software development. cohesion metrics as an indicator of the usability of a user interface during the early stages of user interface development, this paper introduces the Screen Layout Cohesion (SLC) metric, which is based on aesthetic, structural, and semantic aspects of GUIs. In order to investigate the effectiveness of visual. One of these metrics is a visual cohesion metric. Therefore, quantitative techniques such as predictive metrics can be considered an indispensable alternative to address some of user interface issues. ![]() These techniques are costly and time consuming. User interfaces are evaluated through techniques that require end-users and usability experts. ![]() ![]() This discussion focuses on the design of a nonvisual computing Read more Modern computing environments generally employ GUIs to provide an intuitive abstraction to operating system concepts and actions. The design problem is creating a nonvisual interface which provides the same power as a GUI. The technical problem is capturing the information that is being sent to a bit-mapped display. Currently, a significant problem in computer access is providing access to Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs) for computer users who are blind. goal of overcoming more and more technological barriers. For example, computer access has been almost completely driven by the. The necessity of providing access of any kind to existing devices has often outweighed the desire to design systems specifically for a small, although important group of users. Introduction Many of the systems in this book exemplify negotiating a technological barrier in order to provide access to a computer or other device. Visual inspection alone of the 2D X-ray exam distribution by a medical physicist may not be sufficient to accurately select the point of maximum air-kerma rate or barrier thickness. RadShield is shown to accurately find the maximum values of air-kerma rate and barrier thickness using NCRP Report 147 methodology. However, within the R&F room example, differences in locating the most sensitive calculation point on the floor plan for one of the barriers was not considered in the medical physicist's calculation and was revealed by the RadShield calculations. RadShield's barrier thickness calculations were found to be within 0.156 mm lead (Pb) and 0.150 mm lead (Pb) for the adjacent catheteriza-tion labs and R&F room examples, respectively. Percentage errors between the geometry-based approach and RadShield's approach in finding the magnitude and location of the maximum air-kerma rate was within 0.00124% and 14 mm. RadShield's efficacy in finding the maximum air-kerma rate was compared against the geometry-based approach and the overall shielding recommendations by RadShield were compared against the medical physicist's shielding results. #Request a software crack manual#The second approach consisted of comparing RadShield results with those found by manual shielding design by an American Board of Radiology (ABR)-certified medical physicist for two clinical room situations: two adjacent catheterization labs, and a radiographic and fluoroscopic (R&F) exam room. #Request a software crack series#A series of geometry-based equations were derived giv-ing the maximum air-kerma rate magnitude and location through a first derivative root finding approach. calculations are validated by two approaches: a geometry-based approach and a manual approach. The purpose of this study was to introduce and describe the development of RadShield, a Java-based graphical user interface (GUI), which provides a base design that uniquely performs thorough, spatially distributed calculations at many points and reports the maximum air-kerma rate and barrier thickness for each barrier pursuant to NCRP Report 147 methodology. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |